<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Putting Some Fizz Into Bubble Brothers &#8211; Beware Of Corporate Blogspot Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redcardinal.ie/consultancy/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/consultancy/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation Ireland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:41:29 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/consultancy/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1432</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1432</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave

Subdirs Vs subdoms is quite a technical thing - in general Google will tell you that they treat them almost identically, but the devil is generally in the detail. It really boils down to what you want to do - if your site doesn&#039;t have good authority I&#039;d say go with sub-dirs.

If the blog is just published within Joomla on your own site then you dont have an issue - they both appear on your own domain. Hope that makes sense? If your blog is highly related to your website then I&#039;d always publish under the same domain where possible.

Thanks for dropping by
Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave</p>
<p>Subdirs Vs subdoms is quite a technical thing &#8211; in general Google will tell you that they treat them almost identically, but the devil is generally in the detail. It really boils down to what you want to do &#8211; if your site doesn&#8217;t have good authority I&#8217;d say go with sub-dirs.</p>
<p>If the blog is just published within Joomla on your own site then you dont have an issue &#8211; they both appear on your own domain. Hope that makes sense? If your blog is highly related to your website then I&#8217;d always publish under the same domain where possible.</p>
<p>Thanks for dropping by<br />
Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Spathaky</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/consultancy/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1434</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Spathaky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1434</guid>
		<description>----Snip-------
It appears that you cannot redirect to sub-directories. I’m not sure why, but this is a big problem if you host a main site and wish to create a bolt-on blog. Publishing to a sub-domain is an option, but this isn’t always optimal.
----Snip-------

I&#039;m interested in this question. What are the SEO implications of subdirectories and/or sub domains? ...and what about a blog that is embedded within a cms like Joomla? Is it better to be stand alone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;-Snip&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
It appears that you cannot redirect to sub-directories. I’m not sure why, but this is a big problem if you host a main site and wish to create a bolt-on blog. Publishing to a sub-domain is an option, but this isn’t always optimal.<br />
&#8212;-Snip&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested in this question. What are the SEO implications of subdirectories and/or sub domains? &#8230;and what about a blog that is embedded within a cms like Joomla? Is it better to be stand alone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Move From Blogger to Wordpress in 7 Easy Steps &#124; ZoneDate Internet Dating Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/consultancy/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1431</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Move From Blogger to Wordpress in 7 Easy Steps &#124; ZoneDate Internet Dating Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1431</guid>
		<description>[...] refresh tag, and if you host your blog on a subdirectory, you&#8217;re apparently  screwed. See Moving a Corporate Blog from Blogspot To Wordpress for a detailed example of the procedure, and (not having done it myself&#8230;) I recommend [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] refresh tag, and if you host your blog on a subdirectory, you&#8217;re apparently  screwed. See Moving a Corporate Blog from Blogspot To Wordpress for a detailed example of the procedure, and (not having done it myself&#8230;) I recommend [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/consultancy/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1430</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1430</guid>
		<description>Hello Richard, commenters,

As you&#039;ll see, we took the plunge.  There&#039;s still work to do, like setting up a redirect from the Blogspot blog, and writing to people asking them to update links, and more, but the actual transfer from Blogger to our own-hosted Wordpress.org wasn&#039;t too painful according to the man at this end who made it happen.  All suggestions welcome still, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Richard, commenters,</p>
<p>As you&#8217;ll see, we took the plunge.  There&#8217;s still work to do, like setting up a redirect from the Blogspot blog, and writing to people asking them to update links, and more, but the actual transfer from Blogger to our own-hosted Wordpress.org wasn&#8217;t too painful according to the man at this end who made it happen.  All suggestions welcome still, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helping The Blogspot Bloggers - A Tough Test To SEO Blogspot &#124; Search Engine Optimisation Ireland .:. Red Cardinal</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/consultancy/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator>Helping The Blogspot Bloggers - A Tough Test To SEO Blogspot &#124; Search Engine Optimisation Ireland .:. Red Cardinal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1428</guid>
		<description>[...] If you do decide to take the jump then many of the comments I made on the Bubble Brothers post should also be useful. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you do decide to take the jump then many of the comments I made on the Bubble Brothers post should also be useful. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/consultancy/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1429</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1429</guid>
		<description>All this will take me a while to digest, but I get the general feeling that all&#039;s not lost.  Thank you all - Richard especially.  I&#039;d quite like to get the Bubble Brothers main site hugely improved too, and will probably post a request about this in the next few weeks.  If anyone wants to swap expertise for wine, you heard it here first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this will take me a while to digest, but I get the general feeling that all&#8217;s not lost.  Thank you all &#8211; Richard especially.  I&#8217;d quite like to get the Bubble Brothers main site hugely improved too, and will probably post a request about this in the next few weeks.  If anyone wants to swap expertise for wine, you heard it here first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/consultancy/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1424</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t look on it as a mistake any more, I look on it as a deliberate strategy. I still need to create a few blogspot redirects for existing Wordpress blogs ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t look on it as a mistake any more, I look on it as a deliberate strategy. I still need to create a few blogspot redirects for existing Wordpress blogs <img src='http://www.redcardinal.ie/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Holmes</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/consultancy/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1423</guid>
		<description>This is great research Richard and Andy! Funny was just talking to someone that had made the mistake of a blogspot blog the other day - this will come in very handy!

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great research Richard and Andy! Funny was just talking to someone that had made the mistake of a blogspot blog the other day &#8211; this will come in very handy!</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/consultancy/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1425</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1425</guid>
		<description>I do agree, and I would have expected a few more people to maybe have noted how significant a discovery it was.

Overnight I saw andybeard.eu replace my blogspot blog for key search terms - actually replace

Sometimes it is currently quite worrying, because I actually get listings for certain terms from both the blogspot listing and andybeard.eu

For what it is worth, Google also don&#039;t know I am running A Wordpress blog, it is a redirected blogspot, so if any bonus does still occur, it is worthwhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do agree, and I would have expected a few more people to maybe have noted how significant a discovery it was.</p>
<p>Overnight I saw andybeard.eu replace my blogspot blog for key search terms &#8211; actually replace</p>
<p>Sometimes it is currently quite worrying, because I actually get listings for certain terms from both the blogspot listing and andybeard.eu</p>
<p>For what it is worth, Google also don&#8217;t know I am running A Wordpress blog, it is a redirected blogspot, so if any bonus does still occur, it is worthwhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hearne</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/consultancy/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>Hi Andy

It&#039;s really quite odd about the META redirect. All established wisdom is that Google wont use a META refresh as a conduit for link love.

It&#039;s certainly worth testing though.

Best rgds
Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really quite odd about the META redirect. All established wisdom is that Google wont use a META refresh as a conduit for link love.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s certainly worth testing though.</p>
<p>Best rgds<br />
Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/consultancy/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/09-03-2007/corporate-blogging-blogspot-301/#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>I am waiting for Wordpress 2.2 to appear because then hopefully there will be a new blogspot importer. I don&#039;t think the current one is new blogger compatible.

They don&#039;t have to move off blogger immediately though - it has always been possible to host Blogger blogs on your own domain.
Then all they would have to do is use the new 301 redirect. I have no idea why that is buggy.
I have left the meta redirects in place, those actually transferred link equity before the 301 was possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am waiting for Wordpress 2.2 to appear because then hopefully there will be a new blogspot importer. I don&#8217;t think the current one is new blogger compatible.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t have to move off blogger immediately though &#8211; it has always been possible to host Blogger blogs on your own domain.<br />
Then all they would have to do is use the new 301 redirect. I have no idea why that is buggy.<br />
I have left the meta redirects in place, those actually transferred link equity before the 301 was possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
