<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Testing Breadcrumb Navigation Within SERP Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redcardinal.ie/conversion-optimisation/13-08-2009/google-testing-breadcrumb-navigation-within-serp-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/conversion-optimisation/13-08-2009/google-testing-breadcrumb-navigation-within-serp-results/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation Ireland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 12:48:12 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hearne</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/conversion-optimisation/13-08-2009/google-testing-breadcrumb-navigation-within-serp-results/#comment-4931</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=988#comment-4931</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike
Interesting that this test has been running for a little while, but tests regularly last over 30 days. Seems that they tested multiple variations of this particular feature, which was also noteworthy.
Tanks for dropping by,
Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike</p>
<p>Interesting that this test has been running for a little while, but tests regularly last over 30 days. Seems that they tested multiple variations of this particular feature, which was also noteworthy.</p>
<p>Tanks for dropping by,<br />
Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/conversion-optimisation/13-08-2009/google-testing-breadcrumb-navigation-within-serp-results/#comment-4921</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=988#comment-4921</guid>
		<description>I had noticed &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://actionableinsights.covario.com/601/google-following-the-breadcrumb-trail-new-breadcrumb-display-may-have-impact-on-google-ranking-algorithm/&quot;&gt;breadcrumbs in Google SERPS&lt;/a&gt; in early July.  I was seeing them placed a little differently then the screen shots above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had noticed <a rel="nofollow" href="http://actionableinsights.covario.com/601/google-following-the-breadcrumb-trail-new-breadcrumb-display-may-have-impact-on-google-ranking-algorithm/">breadcrumbs in Google SERPS</a> in early July.  I was seeing them placed a little differently then the screen shots above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabio Ricotta</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/conversion-optimisation/13-08-2009/google-testing-breadcrumb-navigation-within-serp-results/#comment-4735</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Ricotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=988#comment-4735</guid>
		<description>Do you know the country that it appeared? Is it for all queries or just for one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know the country that it appeared? Is it for all queries or just for one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Almeida</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/conversion-optimisation/13-08-2009/google-testing-breadcrumb-navigation-within-serp-results/#comment-4734</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Almeida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=988#comment-4734</guid>
		<description>Information Architecture rules! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Information Architecture rules! <img src='http://www.redcardinal.ie/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hearne</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/conversion-optimisation/13-08-2009/google-testing-breadcrumb-navigation-within-serp-results/#comment-4590</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=988#comment-4590</guid>
		<description>Hi Stuart
How&#039;s tricks? I&#039;d say they have some far more advanced techniques to determine if a parent HTML element might contain breadcrumbs. It&#039;s probably also to do with site architecture - if the breadrumbs consistently point to pages above/below in your architecture it might signal a breadcrumb.
@Kieran - I&#039;d imagine they use on-site criteria to determine this.
@Leo - thanks for sending this on to me. I&#039;d probably hold off adding breadcrumbs based only on this test just for now. They test a lot of changes, many of which never see the light of day, so it might be worth waiting to see. I&#039;m not entirely sure how this will affect the sites either.
Personally from a user perspective I think this change might confuse, and given that sitelinks and mini-sitelinks are already out there I don&#039;t see huge value from a user-perspective. Of course just my opinion of course.
Rgds to all, and thanks for dropping by to comment
Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stuart</p>
<p>How&#8217;s tricks? I&#8217;d say they have some far more advanced techniques to determine if a parent HTML element might contain breadcrumbs. It&#8217;s probably also to do with site architecture &#8211; if the breadrumbs consistently point to pages above/below in your architecture it might signal a breadcrumb.</p>
<p>@Kieran &#8211; I&#8217;d imagine they use on-site criteria to determine this.</p>
<p>@Leo &#8211; thanks for sending this on to me. I&#8217;d probably hold off adding breadcrumbs based only on this test just for now. They test a lot of changes, many of which never see the light of day, so it might be worth waiting to see. I&#8217;m not entirely sure how this will affect the sites either.</p>
<p>Personally from a user perspective I think this change might confuse, and given that sitelinks and mini-sitelinks are already out there I don&#8217;t see huge value from a user-perspective. Of course just my opinion of course. </p>
<p>Rgds to all, and thanks for dropping by to comment<br />
Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Curry</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/conversion-optimisation/13-08-2009/google-testing-breadcrumb-navigation-within-serp-results/#comment-4589</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Curry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=988#comment-4589</guid>
		<description>Could it be searching the HTML for something like &#039;div class/id=&quot;breadcrumbs&quot;&#039; - something simple like that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be searching the HTML for something like &#8216;div class/id=&#8221;breadcrumbs&#8221;&#8216; &#8211; something simple like that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Fogarty</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/conversion-optimisation/13-08-2009/google-testing-breadcrumb-navigation-within-serp-results/#comment-4573</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Fogarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=988#comment-4573</guid>
		<description>Actually the breadcrumbs that appear in the serps match the breadcrumbs on the actual sites. The other results that didnt display breadcrumbs were either root domains or internal pages of sites that didn&#039;t use breadcrumbs. So if your not using breadcrumbs, I&#039;d maybe reconsider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the breadcrumbs that appear in the serps match the breadcrumbs on the actual sites. The other results that didnt display breadcrumbs were either root domains or internal pages of sites that didn&#8217;t use breadcrumbs. So if your not using breadcrumbs, I&#8217;d maybe reconsider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: searchbrat</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/conversion-optimisation/13-08-2009/google-testing-breadcrumb-navigation-within-serp-results/#comment-4559</link>
		<dc:creator>searchbrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=988#comment-4559</guid>
		<description>It looks as if Google are pulling those from DMOZ categories or something similiar !!. Probably not. Google are building up to a couple of big changes I think. Next year is going to be really interesting. I feel we are in for a lot of big developments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks as if Google are pulling those from DMOZ categories or something similiar !!. Probably not. Google are building up to a couple of big changes I think. Next year is going to be really interesting. I feel we are in for a lot of big developments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
