<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: VHI.ie &#8211; 5 Simple Steps to Improve UX 100%</title> <atom:link href="http://www.redcardinal.ie/css/22-07-2008/vhi-ie-5-simple-steps-to-improve-ux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/css/22-07-2008/vhi-ie-5-simple-steps-to-improve-ux/</link> <description>Search Engine Optimisation Ireland</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:35:07 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" /> <item><title>By: webmaster</title><link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/css/22-07-2008/vhi-ie-5-simple-steps-to-improve-ux/#comment-2457</link> <dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:03:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=548#comment-2457</guid> <description>Hi DerekI&#039;m not convinced that &#039;click here&#039; is the most effective way to inform users about navigational elements. I just cant help thinking effective UI design would remove the need for &#039;click here&#039;. But hey, that&#039;s just my opinion :)Thanks for dropping by, rgds
Richard</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Derek</p><p>I&#8217;m not convinced that &#8216;click here&#8217; is the most effective way to inform users about navigational elements. I just cant help thinking effective UI design would remove the need for &#8216;click here&#8217;. But hey, that&#8217;s just my opinion <img
src='http://d3ohi9reiehxab.cloudfront.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Thanks for dropping by, rgds<br
/> Richard</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Better Late Than Never Links &#124; Ireland SEO Marketing Online</title><link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/css/22-07-2008/vhi-ie-5-simple-steps-to-improve-ux/#comment-2460</link> <dc:creator>Better Late Than Never Links &#124; Ireland SEO Marketing Online</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:26:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=548#comment-2460</guid> <description>[...] Experience and testing. As always Richard provides brilliant advice which you can read in his post providing 5 simple user experience steps for VHI.ie I have to admit that I’ve learned a lot from that [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Experience and testing. As always Richard provides brilliant advice which you can read in his post providing 5 simple user experience steps for VHI.ie I have to admit that I’ve learned a lot from that [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Derek</title><link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/css/22-07-2008/vhi-ie-5-simple-steps-to-improve-ux/#comment-2459</link> <dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:59:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=548#comment-2459</guid> <description>Totally on the money Richard, with maybe the exception of click here, for some internet novices and im sure with the age profile of a large portion vhi clients it cant do any harm to make the action as obvious as possible. You had time to play around with google chrome yet,
Derek</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally on the money Richard, with maybe the exception of click here, for some internet novices and im sure with the age profile of a large portion vhi clients it cant do any harm to make the action as obvious as possible. You had time to play around with google chrome yet,<br
/> Derek</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: admin</title><link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/css/22-07-2008/vhi-ie-5-simple-steps-to-improve-ux/#comment-2456</link> <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:45:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=548#comment-2456</guid> <description>@Chad - it depends on the domain host I&#039;d imagine. GoDaddy let you do some stuff like this.It also depends on your server OS. MS servers have a different way of handling this.You can also do the redirects at the script level. It incurs a little more overhead, and I&#039;d always try to get the server to do this, but if all else fails use scripts.Rgds, and thanks for commenting
Richard</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chad &#8211; it depends on the domain host I&#8217;d imagine. GoDaddy let you do some stuff like this.</p><p>It also depends on your server OS. MS servers have a different way of handling this.</p><p>You can also do the redirects at the script level. It incurs a little more overhead, and I&#8217;d always try to get the server to do this, but if all else fails use scripts.</p><p>Rgds, and thanks for commenting<br
/> Richard</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chad</title><link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/css/22-07-2008/vhi-ie-5-simple-steps-to-improve-ux/#comment-2458</link> <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:10:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=548#comment-2458</guid> <description>@Richard - a very informative analysis on search engine optimisation you have there. btw, does the www and non-www only controllable through htaccess or through your domain name host?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard &#8211; a very informative analysis on search engine optimisation you have there. btw, does the www and non-www only controllable through htaccess or through your domain name host?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard Hearne</title><link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/css/22-07-2008/vhi-ie-5-simple-steps-to-improve-ux/#comment-2454</link> <dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:20:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=548#comment-2454</guid> <description>@Neil D - your comment got filtered out by Askimet. Sorry about that. Thanks for commenting.Rgds
Richard</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Neil D &#8211; your comment got filtered out by Askimet. Sorry about that. Thanks for commenting.</p><p>Rgds<br
/> Richard</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ad Manager</title><link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/css/22-07-2008/vhi-ie-5-simple-steps-to-improve-ux/#comment-2455</link> <dc:creator>Ad Manager</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:25:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=548#comment-2455</guid> <description>I second your recommendation in staying with conventions, especially for hyperlinks. There are too many ways to make fancy links but only a few usable ones.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second your recommendation in staying with conventions, especially for hyperlinks. There are too many ways to make fancy links but only a few usable ones.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard Hearne</title><link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/css/22-07-2008/vhi-ie-5-simple-steps-to-improve-ux/#comment-2452</link> <dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:54:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=548#comment-2452</guid> <description>Hey TomGood to e-see you.I&#039;m not actually against &#039;click here&#039;, just not happy when buttons look so little like buttons that &#039;click here&#039; is required. I honestly think that designers should be able to come up with better mechanisms. Personal bias I suppose.Rgds, and thanks for dropping by
Richard</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tom</p><p>Good to e-see you.</p><p>I&#8217;m not actually against &#8216;click here&#8217;, just not happy when buttons look so little like buttons that &#8216;click here&#8217; is required. I honestly think that designers should be able to come up with better mechanisms. Personal bias I suppose.</p><p>Rgds, and thanks for dropping by<br
/> Richard</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tom Doyle</title><link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/css/22-07-2008/vhi-ie-5-simple-steps-to-improve-ux/#comment-2453</link> <dc:creator>Tom Doyle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:56:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=548#comment-2453</guid> <description>Hi RichardAs usual some great tips on how people can improve their websites. The only thing I don&#039;t agree with you on is the &quot;Click here&quot; point.From my experience, I always found that &quot;telling&quot; your visitors what to do will get better results in terms of click throughs and conversions.You should look at Brian Clark&#039;s simple experiment - http://www.copyblogger.com/click-here/ - the results are very convincing.This does of course go against what the WAI accessibility guidelines, which is another days work - but none the less, I wouldn&#039;t get VHI to change this, it&#039;s probably the most clicked buttons on the site based on your other findings! :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard</p><p>As usual some great tips on how people can improve their websites. The only thing I don&#8217;t agree with you on is the &#8220;Click here&#8221; point.</p><p>From my experience, I always found that &#8220;telling&#8221; your visitors what to do will get better results in terms of click throughs and conversions.</p><p>You should look at Brian Clark&#8217;s simple experiment &#8211; <a
href="http://www.copyblogger.com/click-here/">http://www.copyblogger.com/click-here/</a> &#8211; the results are very convincing.</p><p>This does of course go against what the WAI accessibility guidelines, which is another days work &#8211; but none the less, I wouldn&#8217;t get VHI to change this, it&#8217;s probably the most clicked buttons on the site based on your other findings! <img
src='http://d3ohi9reiehxab.cloudfront.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Neil D</title><link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/css/22-07-2008/vhi-ie-5-simple-steps-to-improve-ux/#comment-2451</link> <dc:creator>Neil D</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:27:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=548#comment-2451</guid> <description>Nice analysis of VHI&#039;s site. The non-www problem is something that has always puzzled me also.A good example I have seen recently is the Companies House site which must be one of the most-visited sites in the UK. However, http://companieshouse.gov.uk/ returns a 404changing the htaccess to redirect to (what google calls) the canonical version of the domain is a 30 sec job. Makes you wonder sometimes!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice analysis of VHI&#8217;s site. The non-www problem is something that has always puzzled me also.</p><p>A good example I have seen recently is the Companies House site which must be one of the most-visited sites in the UK. However, <a
href="http://companieshouse.gov.uk/">http://companieshouse.gov.uk/</a> returns a 404</p><p>changing the htaccess to redirect to (what google calls) the canonical version of the domain is a 30 sec job. Makes you wonder sometimes!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d3ohi9reiehxab.cloudfront.net

Served from: www.redcardinal.ie @ 2012-02-08 23:38:39 -->
