Comments on: Quite interesting, and while it's very spammy, I think there's a certain…

By: Jim Munro

Jim Munro — Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:27:07 +0000

I was looking at a new site the other day. 100% "not provided".

By: Richard Hearne

Richard Hearne — Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:18:10 +0000

+Jim Munro did I mention how we were once told not to run ranking reports, but instead use our analytics to see which keywords drove traffic? Then Google provided "not provided" to protect everyone's privacy. Oh, except if you paid for that data through Adwords. Not to mention, that "not provided" had ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with the threat posed by remarketing. No. Not. At. All

By: Jim Munro

Jim Munro — Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:16:27 +0000

So dumb though. They misconfigured the link.

By: Martin Harris

Martin Harris — Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:12:19 +0000

Haha Brilliant "Excellent post google i hate those spamming sites but i do like COMPUTER CLASSES IN BERMUDA"

By: Tim Capper

Tim Capper — Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:13:01 +0000

I think the comments should give Google something to think about how people feel about G's own deceptive behaviour.

By: Jim Munro

Jim Munro — Tue, 16 Jul 2013 07:45:39 +0000

Don't hold back, Richard.

By: Richard Hearne

Richard Hearne — Tue, 16 Jul 2013 07:24:48 +0000

And just for giggles check out the link drops in the comments section. Morons.