Comments on: Worst interview responses ever: Search Engine Optimisation Ireland Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:03:56 +0100 hourly 1 By: Jim Munro Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:46:03 +0000 Including a public shaming into the process would not be so reprehensible if it were not for both the innocent and the guilty.

By: Lyndon NA Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:28:26 +0000 It's always been that way though.

By: Richard Hearne Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:25:06 +0000 Actually "worst" is unfair.  But he's really evasive here, and the instruction to go to the forums is bizarre. If I was still helping there I'd be pissed that he's directing users there when their issue can only be dealt with by spam team.

By: Lyndon NA Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:52:21 +0000 Yup.
I called this out the other day – +Matt Cutts should be ashamed of himself.
If there is manual action taken, it is for a specific reason. 
It only takes a minute to select a cause and point to an example.
It takes less than a minute to add in if it's a single page, 5 pages, or a larger collection (and provide a range).

But that's far to much effort for a Googler.
Instead, lets pass the buck to a bunch of volunteers who have no access to any data/information … and expect them to do the support work that Google's to cheap/lazy to provide.