<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Change Their Webmaster Guidelines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/25-10-2006/google-webmaster-guidelines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/25-10-2006/google-webmaster-guidelines/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation Ireland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 12:48:12 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hearne</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/25-10-2006/google-webmaster-guidelines/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 18:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/25-10-2006/google-webmaster-guidelines/#comment-409</guid>
		<description>Hi Jan
I&#039;m doing some work with a very large site (500k+ pages) and one particular area causes all types of indexation problems. Purely down to quite elaborate, multi variable query strings. Query strings are still a very real issue with search engines.
Thanks for dropping by, rgds
Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jan</p>
<p>I&#8217;m doing some work with a very large site (500k+ pages) and one particular area causes all types of indexation problems. Purely down to quite elaborate, multi variable query strings. Query strings are still a very real issue with search engines.</p>
<p>Thanks for dropping by, rgds<br />
Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/25-10-2006/google-webmaster-guidelines/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/25-10-2006/google-webmaster-guidelines/#comment-408</guid>
		<description>Ops, I forgot to mention... I started my site on 10/10/2005 and URLs were OK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ops, I forgot to mention&#8230; I started my site on 10/10/2005 and URLs were OK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/25-10-2006/google-webmaster-guidelines/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/25-10-2006/google-webmaster-guidelines/#comment-407</guid>
		<description>Hm, even this post was posted a couple of months ago, the &amp;id= thing was solved  long time ago.
When I started my primary web site I was even using empty spaces and national encoding characters (Eastern Europe encodings) in URLs (I was a newbie), but Google was able to crawl and index my site anyway.
In addition, some of my current URLs are veeeeeery long. I am going to cut them thanks to cookies usage sometimes in the future. But again, G sees no problems when accessing such pages, following links on them, etc.
Of course, short URLs are always better solution than tons of variables and values after the ? character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, even this post was posted a couple of months ago, the &amp;id= thing was solved  long time ago.</p>
<p>When I started my primary web site I was even using empty spaces and national encoding characters (Eastern Europe encodings) in URLs (I was a newbie), but Google was able to crawl and index my site anyway.</p>
<p>In addition, some of my current URLs are veeeeeery long. I am going to cut them thanks to cookies usage sometimes in the future. But again, G sees no problems when accessing such pages, following links on them, etc.</p>
<p>Of course, short URLs are always better solution than tons of variables and values after the ? character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
