<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Pagerank Export FUD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation Ireland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:00:38 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: David Quaid</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2187</link>
		<dc:creator>David Quaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2187</guid>
		<description>Hi Richard,
Out of curiosity, this site with the PR=5 - what is the Page Title or link of this site? would you care to post it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard,</p>
<p>Out of curiosity, this site with the PR=5 &#8211; what is the Page Title or link of this site? would you care to post it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Quaid</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2186</link>
		<dc:creator>David Quaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2186</guid>
		<description>Following up from this post, I thought I&#039;d do a poll over at IWF to see what other webmasters thought - would they miss PR, and its a surprising result so far:
http://www.irishwebmasterforum.com/search-engine-optimisation/8051-pagerank-would-you-really-miss-it.html#post42697</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following up from this post, I thought I&#8217;d do a poll over at IWF to see what other webmasters thought &#8211; would they miss PR, and its a surprising result so far:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.irishwebmasterforum.com/search-engine-optimisation/8051-pagerank-would-you-really-miss-it.html#post42697">http://www.irishwebmasterforum.com/search-engine-optimisation/8051-pagerank-would-you-really-miss-it.html#post42697</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louie Eire-WebDesign</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2172</link>
		<dc:creator>Louie Eire-WebDesign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2172</guid>
		<description>Thanks got I never got attached to it.
At one time I was watching it, but then I realise I have better things to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks got I never got attached to it.<br />
At one time I was watching it, but then I realise I have better things to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hearne</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2174</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 09:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2174</guid>
		<description>Romano
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jlh-design.com/2007/10/digital-point-members-put-on-suicide-watch/&quot;&gt;DP  Members on Suicide Watch&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romano</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jlh-design.com/2007/10/digital-point-members-put-on-suicide-watch/">DP  Members on Suicide Watch</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romano</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2178</link>
		<dc:creator>Romano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 07:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2178</guid>
		<description>@Richard:
can you post DP link, please?
Many thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard:<br />
can you post DP link, please?<br />
Many thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hearne</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2173</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 08:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2173</guid>
		<description>I read a great post recenty about DP being placed on suicide watch. Laughed a lot at that.
Rgds
Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read a great post recenty about DP being placed on suicide watch. Laughed a lot at that.</p>
<p>Rgds<br />
Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rooney</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2181</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 01:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2181</guid>
		<description>I also think they should just turn it off, but then you know the whole of DP will be running around like headless chickens! lol And they will next look to Alexa, but that is way to easy to abuse!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think they should just turn it off, but then you know the whole of DP will be running around like headless chickens! lol And they will next look to Alexa, but that is way to easy to abuse!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2177</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2177</guid>
		<description>I agree, turn it off Google. Too many people are caught up in the confusion plus there are SEO folks out there that exploit it to sell their service.
Would the &#039;average&#039; Google user really miss it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, turn it off Google. Too many people are caught up in the confusion plus there are SEO folks out there that exploit it to sell their service.</p>
<p>Would the &#8216;average&#8217; Google user really miss it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McAWilliams</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2184</link>
		<dc:creator>McAWilliams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2184</guid>
		<description>thank god I came here, my serp rankings seem to be still in tact and my PR of 4 remains as it has been for quite a long time, even though backlinks and page code etc have been well and truely cleaned up.
But I did go to a blog I contribute on and was shocked at what I saw a PR of 5, something I have been trying to get for years. The blog is not even a year old has 91 backlinks in Google compared to my 190ish links, I was seriously freaked out. But it seems I am not alone in this confusion thank god.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank god I came here, my serp rankings seem to be still in tact and my PR of 4 remains as it has been for quite a long time, even though backlinks and page code etc have been well and truely cleaned up.</p>
<p>But I did go to a blog I contribute on and was shocked at what I saw a PR of 5, something I have been trying to get for years. The blog is not even a year old has 91 backlinks in Google compared to my 190ish links, I was seriously freaked out. But it seems I am not alone in this confusion thank god.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Callan</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2185</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Callan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2185</guid>
		<description>My site has dropped down to PR 4, hasn&#039;t been that in years.
Also my resources page dropped from PR 5 to PR 0. I noticed redflymarketing is down from 7 to 6 now. Seems something strange is going on anyhow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My site has dropped down to PR 4, hasn&#8217;t been that in years.<br />
Also my resources page dropped from PR 5 to PR 0. I noticed redflymarketing is down from 7 to 6 now. Seems something strange is going on anyhow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hearne</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2183</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2183</guid>
		<description>Nope - my site ranks for most of the terms I target. That&#039;s my goal, not the figure showing in a small green bar.
Negativity is toward the way Google is treating the webmaster community in general, and the SEO community in particular. At a micro level many of the Googlers are fantastically helpful, but at the macro level Google has has lost the plot IMO.
And what&#039;s the chances that youtube.com got a hand job?
Rgds
Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope &#8211; my site ranks for most of the terms I target. That&#8217;s my goal, not the figure showing in a small green bar.</p>
<p>Negativity is toward the way Google is treating the webmaster community in general, and the SEO community in particular. At a micro level many of the Googlers are fantastically helpful, but at the macro level Google has has lost the plot IMO.</p>
<p>And what&#8217;s the chances that youtube.com got a hand job?</p>
<p>Rgds<br />
Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2182</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2182</guid>
		<description>YouTube is back to PR8 and their Irish version is now PR6. They are strange examples David, just goes to show that PR is BS.
Richard : negativity , is probably due to people thinking they deserve higher PR. ;)
paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube is back to PR8 and their Irish version is now PR6. They are strange examples David, just goes to show that PR is BS.</p>
<p>Richard : negativity , is probably due to people thinking they deserve higher PR. <img src='http://www.redcardinal.ie/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donncha O Caoimh</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2175</link>
		<dc:creator>Donncha O Caoimh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2175</guid>
		<description>Well, after my site dropped to PR4 I dropped text link ads, so I guess Google are getting what they want. On the other hand, my traffic hasn&#039;t changed one bit. It&#039;s up slightly in fact!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, after my site dropped to PR4 I dropped text link ads, so I guess Google are getting what they want. On the other hand, my traffic hasn&#8217;t changed one bit. It&#8217;s up slightly in fact!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hearne</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2180</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2180</guid>
		<description>Personally I&#039;d rather if they just turned it off than churn out quite obviously false data.
Is it just me, or does anyone else sense a huge amount of negativity in the webmaster community toward Google?
Cheers for dropping by David,
Rgds
Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I&#8217;d rather if they just turned it off than churn out quite obviously false data.</p>
<p>Is it just me, or does anyone else sense a huge amount of negativity in the webmaster community toward Google?</p>
<p>Cheers for dropping by David,<br />
Rgds<br />
Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Eaves</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2171</link>
		<dc:creator>David Eaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2171</guid>
		<description>I have more proof of the BS PR:
This thread that I started at da point received over 400 natural links including some authority ones:
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=461494
This page got a PR3.
Another thread I started, received hardly any:
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=487451
This page got a PR6, anyone who can work that one out is an SEO god.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have more proof of the BS PR:</p>
<p>This thread that I started at da point received over 400 natural links including some authority ones:</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=461494">http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=461494</a></p>
<p>This page got a PR3.</p>
<p>Another thread I started, received hardly any:</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=487451">http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=487451</a></p>
<p>This page got a PR6, anyone who can work that one out is an SEO god.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hearne</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2179</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2179</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s exactly what TBPR now is for Google - &#039;Tool Bar Public Relations&#039;
Rgds
Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly what TBPR now is for Google &#8211; &#8216;Tool Bar Public Relations&#8217;</p>
<p>Rgds<br />
Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2176</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/26-10-2007/google-pagerank-export-lies/#comment-2176</guid>
		<description>True they have been messing around with this for the last month or so. Trying to penalise blogs and what not, it it just a PR (public relations that is) job for google ??
paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True they have been messing around with this for the last month or so. Trying to penalise blogs and what not, it it just a PR (public relations that is) job for google ??<br />
paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
