<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Golden Spiders Awards 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redcardinal.ie/marketing/31-10-2007/golden-spiders-awards-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/marketing/31-10-2007/golden-spiders-awards-2007/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation Ireland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 12:48:12 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hearne</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/marketing/31-10-2007/golden-spiders-awards-2007/#comment-2190</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/marketing/31-10-2007/golden-spiders-awards-2007/#comment-2190</guid>
		<description>Hi Karl
Not sure about being corrupt, but there has always been a lot of negative feeling toward an awards where companies can sponsor a category, sit on the judging panel, and also be a nominee.
And the other issue has been the quality of many of the nominated sites - previously there was no consideration given to web standards of any description.
Best of luck with the awards,
Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Karl</p>
<p>Not sure about being corrupt, but there has always been a lot of negative feeling toward an awards where companies can sponsor a category, sit on the judging panel, and also be a nominee.</p>
<p>And the other issue has been the quality of many of the nominated sites &#8211; previously there was no consideration given to web standards of any description.</p>
<p>Best of luck with the awards,<br />
Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karl</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/marketing/31-10-2007/golden-spiders-awards-2007/#comment-2188</link>
		<dc:creator>karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/marketing/31-10-2007/golden-spiders-awards-2007/#comment-2188</guid>
		<description>jeez, we submitted our site and got short listed (www.mortgagebrokers.ie) but i had no idea the awards were in any way twisted? we are up against companies 100 times our size so i don&#039;t hold too high the hopes of winning. whats the story with people saying they are corrupt? in what way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeez, we submitted our site and got short listed (www.mortgagebrokers.ie) but i had no idea the awards were in any way twisted? we are up against companies 100 times our size so i don&#8217;t hold too high the hopes of winning. whats the story with people saying they are corrupt? in what way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robin</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/marketing/31-10-2007/golden-spiders-awards-2007/#comment-2189</link>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/marketing/31-10-2007/golden-spiders-awards-2007/#comment-2189</guid>
		<description>Any awards ceremony that requires you to &lt;i&gt;pay&lt;/i&gt; to enter is corrupt by definition. As it turns out I am building a website for a different Irish awards ceremony at present (not to do with web design). They wouldn&#039;t dream of having nominates pay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any awards ceremony that requires you to <i>pay</i> to enter is corrupt by definition. As it turns out I am building a website for a different Irish awards ceremony at present (not to do with web design). They wouldn&#8217;t dream of having nominates pay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/marketing/31-10-2007/golden-spiders-awards-2007/#comment-2191</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/marketing/31-10-2007/golden-spiders-awards-2007/#comment-2191</guid>
		<description>Probably a lot to do with design/development attribution in the footer of the site.
@Ken: You couldn&#039;t have said it better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably a lot to do with design/development attribution in the footer of the site.</p>
<p>@Ken: You couldn&#8217;t have said it better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/marketing/31-10-2007/golden-spiders-awards-2007/#comment-2192</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/marketing/31-10-2007/golden-spiders-awards-2007/#comment-2192</guid>
		<description>Another year, another corrupt award ceremony. Still though, it&#039;s nice to see the usual bedfellows in there being shortlisted. I feel sorry for any of the genuine entrants who forked out money to submit their sites to this utter farce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another year, another corrupt award ceremony. Still though, it&#8217;s nice to see the usual bedfellows in there being shortlisted. I feel sorry for any of the genuine entrants who forked out money to submit their sites to this utter farce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
