<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Even The Big Guys Can Get It Wrong</title> <atom:link href="http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/</link> <description>Search Engine Optimisation Ireland</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:35:07 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" /> <item><title>By: Richard Hearne</title><link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1888</link> <dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:22:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1888</guid> <description>OllyPerhaps it would be better to serve your HTML version by default and redirect flash enabled browsers to your flash area? I dont know any stats, but I reckon users without JS are likely to be without Flash also?I avoid flash like the plague. You could ask this over on the Google Webmaster Help group where I&#039;m sure someone will give you a better answer than I can.Best rgds
Richard</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olly</p><p>Perhaps it would be better to serve your HTML version by default and redirect flash enabled browsers to your flash area? I dont know any stats, but I reckon users without JS are likely to be without Flash also?</p><p>I avoid flash like the plague. You could ask this over on the Google Webmaster Help group where I&#8217;m sure someone will give you a better answer than I can.</p><p>Best rgds<br
/> Richard</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Olly</title><link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1889</link> <dc:creator>Olly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:28:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1889</guid> <description>I&#039;m trying to improve a flash detection script on one of my clients sites.Upon detecting that a user doesn&#039;t have flash using javacscipt, I want to redirect them to a non-flash page.However if a user doesn&#039;t have javascript I would need to redirect them using the http-equiv=&quot;Refresh&quot; inside  tags.Now would that cause problems for search engine spiders? What is the best way to provide flash detection without compromising SEO?Thanks,
Olly</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to improve a flash detection script on one of my clients sites.</p><p>Upon detecting that a user doesn&#8217;t have flash using javacscipt, I want to redirect them to a non-flash page.</p><p>However if a user doesn&#8217;t have javascript I would need to redirect them using the http-equiv=&#8221;Refresh&#8221; inside  tags.</p><p>Now would that cause problems for search engine spiders? What is the best way to provide flash detection without compromising SEO?</p><p>Thanks,<br
/> Olly</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the bogosphere snapshot on July 6th 2007 at Holy Shmoly!</title><link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1892</link> <dc:creator>the bogosphere snapshot on July 6th 2007 at Holy Shmoly!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 17:56:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1892</guid> <description>[...] rips apart the Independent&#8217;s website and discovers some silly JS [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rips apart the Independent&#8217;s website and discovers some silly JS [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard Hearne</title><link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1890</link> <dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:22:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1890</guid> <description>Hey RogerI think you hit the nail on the head - advertising Vs SEO. But I think there is a place for a happy medium by ensuring that there is a framework in place to ensure that both functions can achieve their stated goals by working together.Nice to have someone from my old hunting ground commenting :grin:Thanks for dropping by, best rgds
Richard</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Roger</p><p>I think you hit the nail on the head &#8211; advertising Vs SEO. But I think there is a place for a happy medium by ensuring that there is a framework in place to ensure that both functions can achieve their stated goals by working together.</p><p>Nice to have someone from my old hunting ground commenting <img
src='http://d3ohi9reiehxab.cloudfront.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':grin:' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Thanks for dropping by, best rgds<br
/> Richard</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Roger Black</title><link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1891</link> <dc:creator>Roger Black</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:13:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1891</guid> <description>I guess they&#039;re in a rock and a hard place between SEO and advertising demmands!  Lets face it, we&#039;ve all worked in places where $ talks sometimes more than best practice.Overall though I think their SEO is impressive, under the hood they&#039;ve a good deal of customisation going on, even down to article pages which is neat.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess they&#8217;re in a rock and a hard place between SEO and advertising demmands!  Lets face it, we&#8217;ve all worked in places where $ talks sometimes more than best practice.</p><p>Overall though I think their SEO is impressive, under the hood they&#8217;ve a good deal of customisation going on, even down to article pages which is neat.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d3ohi9reiehxab.cloudfront.net

Served from: www.redcardinal.ie @ 2012-02-10 00:51:57 -->
