<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Even The Big Guys Can Get It Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation Ireland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:00:38 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hearne</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1888</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1888</guid>
		<description>Olly
Perhaps it would be better to serve your HTML version by default and redirect flash enabled browsers to your flash area? I dont know any stats, but I reckon users without JS are likely to be without Flash also?
I avoid flash like the plague. You could ask this over on the Google Webmaster Help group where I&#039;m sure someone will give you a better answer than I can.
Best rgds
Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olly</p>
<p>Perhaps it would be better to serve your HTML version by default and redirect flash enabled browsers to your flash area? I dont know any stats, but I reckon users without JS are likely to be without Flash also?</p>
<p>I avoid flash like the plague. You could ask this over on the Google Webmaster Help group where I&#8217;m sure someone will give you a better answer than I can.</p>
<p>Best rgds<br />
Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olly</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator>Olly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1889</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying to improve a flash detection script on one of my clients sites.
Upon detecting that a user doesn&#039;t have flash using javacscipt, I want to redirect them to a non-flash page.
However if a user doesn&#039;t have javascript I would need to redirect them using the http-equiv=&quot;Refresh&quot; inside  tags.
Now would that cause problems for search engine spiders? What is the best way to provide flash detection without compromising SEO?
Thanks,
Olly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to improve a flash detection script on one of my clients sites.</p>
<p>Upon detecting that a user doesn&#8217;t have flash using javacscipt, I want to redirect them to a non-flash page.</p>
<p>However if a user doesn&#8217;t have javascript I would need to redirect them using the http-equiv=&#8221;Refresh&#8221; inside  tags.</p>
<p>Now would that cause problems for search engine spiders? What is the best way to provide flash detection without compromising SEO?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Olly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the bogosphere snapshot on July 6th 2007 at Holy Shmoly!</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator>the bogosphere snapshot on July 6th 2007 at Holy Shmoly!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 17:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1892</guid>
		<description>[...] rips apart the Independent&#8217;s website and discovers some silly JS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rips apart the Independent&#8217;s website and discovers some silly JS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hearne</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1890</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1890</guid>
		<description>Hey Roger
I think you hit the nail on the head - advertising Vs SEO. But I think there is a place for a happy medium by ensuring that there is a framework in place to ensure that both functions can achieve their stated goals by working together.
Nice to have someone from my old hunting ground commenting :grin:
Thanks for dropping by, best rgds
Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Roger</p>
<p>I think you hit the nail on the head &#8211; advertising Vs SEO. But I think there is a place for a happy medium by ensuring that there is a framework in place to ensure that both functions can achieve their stated goals by working together.</p>
<p>Nice to have someone from my old hunting ground commenting <img src='http://www.redcardinal.ie/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':grin:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for dropping by, best rgds<br />
Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Black</title>
		<link>http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1891</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/06-07-2007/bad-seo-independent-ie/#comment-1891</guid>
		<description>I guess they&#039;re in a rock and a hard place between SEO and advertising demmands!  Lets face it, we&#039;ve all worked in places where $ talks sometimes more than best practice.
Overall though I think their SEO is impressive, under the hood they&#039;ve a good deal of customisation going on, even down to article pages which is neat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess they&#8217;re in a rock and a hard place between SEO and advertising demmands!  Lets face it, we&#8217;ve all worked in places where $ talks sometimes more than best practice.</p>
<p>Overall though I think their SEO is impressive, under the hood they&#8217;ve a good deal of customisation going on, even down to article pages which is neat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
